5 Things Your First Readers
Won’t Tell You (But Should)
by Art Holcomb
Writers work
almost entirely in the head, isolated and alone - whether in a quiet office, a
busy Starbuck’s or in the den with a four-year old playing tea party with her
bear around your feet.
It’s just the
nature of the beast.
And, at some
point - certainly before any given piece of writing is sent to an agent or
editor - and probably just after you
have written something particularly clever – you’ll want (actually NEED) to
show it to someone, and allow them to bask in the glow of your creative
brilliance and remind you that you are loved and beautiful.
You’ll print the piece out or email it to the
person you trust most and then smile and wait for the accolades to come in to
refill your emotional tank.
Be
careful. There’s something you should
know . . .
It’s may be a
trap.
Because you
are probably choosing the wrong person for the wrong reasons to be your First
Reader.
According to a
major university study, more that 85% of all artists (including writers,
painters, sculptors, etc.,) turn to a family member or loved one for the first
opinion of their work, and more than 75% of those will seek out friends and
loved ones exclusively.
Now, feedback
comes in all kinds of sizes, shapes, colors and concentration. Positive feedback can make you continue with
a bad project or head down a dead end road.
Negative feedback can put the skids on a project that is on the verge of
showing incredible promise. Either situation can be deadly.
Because
there’s a lot at stake for you emotionally and professionally, consider
the following possible things that these first reader might want to tell you
but can’t. This is especially true when
giving the work to a loved one or friend because - the real problem is –
you like these people and they would very much like that to continue:
(1)
I’m
worried about your reaction and I don’t want to offend you. Young writers
never react well to bad news. They see
criticism of the work as criticism of themselves – it’s only natural. The reader may think: I don’t want you
unhappy with me so I’ll be passive and will color my responses – So . . . I’ll just
be encouraging!
(2)
I
might not have enough time to do your piece justice and so I’ll just give it a
positive review. S/he’ll be happy with that. Time can be critical – it is a
major investment in time and energy to read a draft of a novel so as to offer any
kind of meaningful criticism. Few people realize that when they agree to read
your work.
(3)
The
subject/genre/medium doesn’t interest me – and so I can’t get deep enough into
it to give a fair reaction. Personally, I love science fiction and mysteries
but don’t care for fantasies. I always
come into reviewing a new SF experience with excitement. If I’m asked to review a fantasy novel, I’m
approaching it at a deficit from the very beginning. I’m not the right guy for the fantasy first
read - if what you’re looking for is objectivity. This can be a vital piece of
information that you need!
(4)
I
just don’t want to read it – no matter what it is – but saying so may hurt your
feeling or make me seem like a jerk. Enough said.
(5)
I
might have an agenda of my own: Writers are vulnerable and it is an act of trust
that we put ourselves and our work out there in another’s hands and say “Do
your worst.” You need to be sure of the readers motivations. You can often find
in critique groups writers that want only praise for their own work, while always
having a bad thing to say about anyone else’s. Agenda are important!
So, when the
time comes for a first opinion about your new work, keep in mind - the
relationship between artist and critic is a powerful and oft-times fragile
one.
You should keep in mind the
following:
Be sure you know what you want from your
First Reader from the very beginning. If you are looking for general
impressions and encouragement to go on, then someone who likes to read and
enjoys books could give you what you’re looking for. If instead you’re looking for a technical
critique, you will need an experienced (and published) fellow writer or editor
(and hopefully someone working in your genre).
Never let anyone read your first RAW draft!
No matter how much you need technical help or validation, this work is never
ready to show around until you have had some editorial passes to it for
structure, characterization and story issues.
Take the time and make sure you’re giving them something that reflects
your best and considered effort. One of
the worst things that can happen is to give the reader a raw draft and then
several other drafts as the stories change; the mind cannot help but average
them all together, making the changes harder to track and polluting their
impressions of your finished work.
The real value of a First Reader is to tell
you where the story LOSES HIS/HER INTEREST. That will lead you to the areas
that need work. Pay very close attention to that - if you’ve lost them on page
145, you’ll lose your fans there as well, and that would be the real tragedy.
Due Diligence is the key: Take your ego
out of the equations and find the best person available to give you a fair and
honest appraisal. Writers and criticism circles can be great, and never have
there been more professional services available to you to help develop your
stories – but be careful, not everyone who advertises their services are
equally qualified. Best to stay with
people you trust. People you can develop
a long term relationship with.